2 months ago
Finalmente cominciano a darti ragione ... See MoreSee Less
4 neurodegeneratives cases treated with Blood Derived Stem Cells ... See MoreSee Less
Un piccolo pony affetto da una patologia neurodegenerativa curato con le staminali del sangue. ... See MoreSee Less
Carlson, 19 years old, after blood stem cells treatment for coxo-femoral joint ... See MoreSee Less
I’m going to show you these two film clips of animals where we see that the evolution of a serious disease changes if interaction with Lyme syndrome is taken into account when it is present.
The first is of a dog that initially displayed lameness that then progressed into a paretic neurological symptomatology and finally into a "coma" state in which the boxer Brigitta no longer recognized its owner.
The initial diagnosis was of lameness with the suspicion of joint infection, then, due to the neurological symptoms’ evolution, an MRI was done which revealed vertebral lesions for which cortisone was administered, in the meantime the blood tests were positive for Leishmaniasis, therefore the specific therapy, which is very toxic for the kidneys and liver, was added. The result was that the clinical situation precipitated and the dog found itself in danger of life even if the therapy followed with the current medical paradigm acts promptly but does not take into account interconnections. Hence no one can be blamed if the disease’s evolution took a turn for the worse.
On the other hand, the owner, evaluating the situation, decided to bring the dog home so that at least she could die in her family environment and, since I am the veterinarian of the owner’s horse, she asked me if there were any possible alternative therapies we could try.
To follow a diverse therapy one must start from a different vision …let’s suppose that all these symptoms have a common denominator: Lyme syndrome. Borrelias and/or bartellonas are present in joints, evolves into meningitis, inhibits the immune system and co-infections such as leishmania develop. So I subjected the little dog to the Lyme syndrome protocol and later I also inoculated the blood stem cells: in the film clip first you see her in the clinic, then as she recovered and therefore was saved.
The second case shows a horse that has symptoms similar to multiple sclerosis and, even before starting stem cells treatment, the Lyme disease protocol was followed and symptomatic improvement was revealed in a condition considered incurable. The horse demonstrated the immunoglobulin dosage for Borrelia, 1/128, which in my experience is very high. Only 30% of people with Lyme syndrome show a rise, so there is a 70% false negative.
During these years I have shared the protocol that I use in animals with some human doctors and I explained to them that there are three types of patients with Lyme:
- those with established Lyme who have already been treated for years with antibiotics are the most difficult cases because their pathological state, when it continues to be progressive despite antibiotics, is attributed to continuous co-infections. The prompt classic therapy focuses on one infectious agent after another, not considering the terrain on which the disease develops and ends up destroying the micro-biome in a short time, the lack of which allows new biofilms to be formed with which the bacteria defend themselves.
- those with serious pathologies in which Lyme syndrome enters as a contributory cause, such as degenerative, immune and cancer diseases, etc.., but, in this case, to be very effective the therapy must be completed by using blood stem cells
- those with initial symptoms (remember that Lyme syndrome has a very long evolution) that can be very annoying, but bearable, which they can live with until significant aggravation occurs.
In this third case, more so than the others, it is important to use the prevention protocol that I use in animals. It is crucial to "clinically" suspect and diagnose Lyme and, through this approach, my medical friends have managed to eliminate and prevent much suffering.
Basically it is a fact that to cure an incurable eye disease of the horse, Moon blindness, veterinarians use doxycycline, the preferred antibiotic for Lyme syndrome because it manages to penetrate the biofilm. The same antibiotic was also used to treat breast cancer and the Nobel Prize for Medicine, Luc Montagnier, the first to identify the AIDS virus in 1983, has been working for a few years on neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and Autism using antibiotics like doxicycline. In particular Autism too, according to a study conducted on 200 children, could be treated with good results with this antibiotic therapy.
Although the effects of doxicycline are not attributed by doctors/researchers to Lyme syndrome, it appears from our knowledge that it is conceivable we are facing a pandemic to which little weight is given because it contradicts the tendency towards specialization and returns to the overall vision opposed by the current paradigm. The same trial, which should start from homogeneous cases, is in crisis because there is no homogeneity in Lyme, in fact if Lyme syndrome has as base infectious agents Borreliae and Bartonelle that in total are over 100, it is logical that the cocktails of these bacteria are very different and thus develop diverse symptoms and diverse responses to treatment. If we also consider that one of the features of Lyme syndrome is to inhibit the immune system, a proliferation of thousands of co-infections is normal, therefore the same basic pathology leads to thousands of different symptoms. So where has the homogeneity from which the experiment should start, gone?
We are thus faced with a pathology consistent with the interconnection that denies homogeneity that is the base characteristic of the current trial.
Doctors have found that an early diagnosis based on symptoms such as shoulder pain, unjustified fatigue, fibromyalgia, headache, joint pain, migrant symptoms, recurrent dermatitis, visual fatigue, corneal ulcers, etc., can be improved with the new protocol and above all it can be the prevention for very serious pathologies such as neurodegenerative ones that manifest themselves over time. Doctors who have acquired my veterinarian protocol and have enriched it, are also capable of improving diseases considered incurable when connected to Lyme syndrome, the example is the horse in the video.
Since the use of autologous stem cells is not allowed in Italy, I have decided to transfer the protocol to other doctors in the Ukraine in order to complete the entire protocol that today can only be implemented in veterinary medicine.
The doctors have organized themselves thus: in Italy they practice the complete protocol for Lyme, applying it to the three types of Lyme patients and in cases of serious neurological diseases other doctors in the Ukraine use the legally approved protocol with blood stem cells, finally producing publications on human clinical cases.
Hence one can make an early diagnosis of Lyme or one can explain pathologies considered to have no obvious cause and therefore treat them by going to the source then deciding whether or not these patients can go to the Ukraine. Through this you can understand that diseases considered incurable today have a greater chance of improvement: from multiple sclerosis to autism, etc. So doctors in Italy will have to examine those who have troublesome symptoms, prevent very serious illnesses or lengthen the time of manifestation and implement this therapeutic approach using many different techniques that work on the terrain and not exclusively on the causal factor using what modern physics has taught us is good contrasting the rigidity of the current paradigm. ... See MoreSee Less
Vi mostro questi due filmati di animali in cui si vede che l’evoluzione di una malattia grave cambia se viene presa in considerazione l’interazione con la sindrome di Lyme quando questa sussiste.
Il primo è un cane che mostrava inizialmente una zoppia che è progredita in una sintomatologia neurologica paretica ed infine in uno stato di “coma” nel quale la boxer Brigitta non riconosceva più la sua proprietaria.
La diagnosi iniziale era di zoppia con sospetto di infezione articolare, poi, per l’evoluzione di sintomi neurologici, è stata fatta una risonanza dove si evidenziavano lesioni vertebrali per cui è stato somministrato cortisone, nel frattempo dalle analisi del sangue è risultata la positività alla Leishmaniosi, per cui è stata aggiunta la terapia specifica che è molto tossica per reni e fegato. Il risultato è stato che è precipitato il quadro clinico ed il cane si è trovato in pericolo di vita anche se la terapia era coerente all’attuale paradigma medico che agisce in modo puntuale senza tener conto delle interconnessioni. Per cui non si può dare la colpa a nessuno se l’evoluzione della malattia aveva preso quella piega.
D’altro canto la proprietaria, valutando la situazione, decise di portare la cagnetta a casa perchè almeno si spegnesse nel suo ambiente familiare e, poiché sono il veterinario del suo cavallo, mi chiese se ci fosse il modo di tentare una strada terapeutica alternativa.
Per instaurare una terapia diversa si deve partire da una visione differente…. supponiamo allora che tutti questi sintomi abbiano un denominatore comune: la sindrome di Lyme. Borrelie e/o bartonelle presenti nell’articolazione, evoluzione in meningite, inibizione del sistema immunitario e sviluppo di una co-infezione come la leishmania. Per cui ho sottoposto la cagnetta al protocollo per la sindrome di Lyme ed in un secondo momento ho anche inoculato le staminali del sangue: la vedete durante il filmato prima quando era in clinica, poi ristabilita e quindi salva.
Il secondo caso mostra un cavallo che ha una sintomatologia sovrapponibile alla sclerosi multipla e, prima ancora di cominciare il trattamento con le staminali, con il solo protocollo per il morbo di lyme ha mostrato miglioramenti sintomatici in una patologia considerata incurabile. Il cavallo aveva mostrato il dosaggio delle immunoglobuline per la borrelia 1/128 che nella mia esperienza è molto alto. Solo il 30 % degli affetti da sindrome di Lyme mostra un rialzo, vi è quindi un 70% di falsi negativi.
In questi anni ho condiviso il protocollo che uso negli animali con alcuni medici umani ed ho spiegato loro che esistono tre tipi di pazienti con il lyme:
-quelli con il Lyme accertato che sono già stati curati per anni con antibiotici sono i casi più difficili perché il loro stato patologico, quando continua ad essere progressivo, nonostante gli antibiotici, è attribuito a continue co-infezioni. E la terapia classica che è puntuale si focalizza su un agente infettivo dopo l’altro, non considerando il terreno su cui la malattia si sviluppa finendo per distruggere in breve tempo il microbioma, la cui mancanza permette la formazione di nuovi biofilm con cui i batteri si difendono.
-quelli con patologie gravi in cui la sindrome di Lyme entra come con-causa, come malattie degenerative, immunitarie, oncologiche, etc… ma in questo caso la terapia per essere molto efficace deve essere completata dall’uso delle staminali del sangue
- quelli con sintomi iniziali (ricordiamo che la sindrome di Lyme porta ad evoluzione anche in tempi molto lunghi) che possono essere molto fastidiosi, ma sopportabili, con cui le persone convivono fino al sopraggiungere di aggravamenti significativi.
In questo terzo caso, più degli altri, è importante usare il protocollo che uso negli animali per la prevenzione. È importante cioè sospettare e diagnosticare “clinicamente” il Lyme e, tramite questo approccio, i miei amici medici sono riusciti ad eliminare e prevenire tanta sofferenza…
In fondo sono dati di fatto che per curare una malattia incurabile dell’occhio del cavallo, il Mal della Luna, i veterinari usano la doxyciclina, l’antibiotico d’elezione per la sindrome di Lyme perché riesce a penetrare il biofilm. Così lo stesso antibiotico è stato usato per curare il cancro del seno ed anche Il premio Nobel per la medicina, Luc Montagnier, il primo a individuare il virus dell’Aids nel 1983, lavora da qualche anno su malattie neurodegenerative come Parkinson, Alzheimer ed Autismo usando antibiotici come la doxicyclina. L'Autismo in particolare, secondo un suo studio condotto su 200 bambini, potrebbe essere trattato con buoni risultati anche con questa terapia antibiotica.
Anche se gli effetti della doxicyclina non è attribuita dai medici/ricercatori alla sindrome di Lyme, da ciò che appare dalle nostre conoscenze è ipotizzabile che siamo di fronte ad una pandemia a cui si dà poco peso perché contraddice la tendenza alla specializzazione e riporta alla visione d’insieme osteggiata dal paradigma attuale. La stessa sperimentazione, che dovrebbe partire da casi omogenei, è messa in crisi perché nel Lyme non esiste omogeneità. infatti se la sindrome di Lyme ha come agenti infettivi di base Borrelie e Bartonelle che sono complessivamente oltre 100 è logico che siano molto differenti i cocktail di questi batteri e che sviluppino così sintomi diversi e risposte diverse al trattamento. Se inoltre consideriamo che una delle caratteristiche della sindrome di Lyme è inibire il sistema immunitario è normale una proliferazione di migliaia di co-infezioni per cui la stessa patologia di base porta a migliaia di sintomatologie diverse. Allora dove va a finire l’omogeneità da cui dovrebbe partire la sperimentazione?
Siamo quindi di fronte ad una patologia coerente all’interconnessione che nega l’omogeneità che è la caratteristica su cui si basa l’attuale sperimentazione.
I medici hanno constatato che una diagnosi precoce basata su sintomi come dolore alle spalle, stanchezza ingiustificata, fibromialgia, mal di testa, dolori articolari, sintomi migranti, dermatiti ricorrenti, affaticamento visivo, ulcere corneali, etc… possono essere migliorati con il nuovo protocollo e soprattutto possono essere la prevenzione per patologie gravissime come quelle neurodegenerative che si manifestano nel tempo. I medici che hanno acquisito il mio protocollo veterinario e lo hanno arricchito sono capaci anche di migliorare patologie considerate incurabili quando connesse alla sindrome di Lyme, l’esempio è il cavallo del video.
Poiché in Italia non è concesso l’uso delle staminali autologhe ho deciso di cedere il protocollo ad altri medici in Ucraina per portare a compimento l’intero protocollo che ad oggi qui si può attuare solo in veterinaria.
I medici si sono così organizzati: in Italia praticano il protocollo completo per il Lyme applicandolo ai tre tipi di malati di Lyme e nei casi di patologie neurologiche gravi altri medici usano in Ucraina il protocollo legalmente approvato con le staminali ottenute da sangue producendo finalmente pubblicazioni su casi clinici umani.
Cosi si può fare una diagnosi precoce di lyme o si possono spiegare patologie considerate senza causa evidente e quindi curale andando all’origine per poi decidere se tali pazienti possano andare o meno in Ucraina. Capite che così patologie che oggi sono considerate incurabili possono avere maggiori possibilità di miglioramento: dalla sclerosi multipla, all’autismo, etc… Quindi i medici in Italia dovranno visitare coloro che hanno sintomi fastidiosi, prevenire malattie molto gravi o allungare i tempi di manifestazione e fare questo approccio terapeutico usando molte tecniche diverse che lavorano sul terreno e non esclusivamente sul fattore causale usando ciò che di buono ha insegnato la fisica moderna contrapponendosi alla rigidità dell’attuale paradigma. ... See MoreSee Less
BRIGITTA, UNA CAGNETTA CON LA SINDROME DI LYME A CUI SEGUE UN APPROFONDIMENTO DEL LYME NEGLI ESSERI UMANI
“Brigitta inizia la sua malattia zoppicando ed il Veterinario a cui mi ero rivolta, dopo una radiografia, dice che non è nulla di grave. Questo succede di venerdì pomeriggio, la domenica sera Brigitta si paralizza e non cammina più.
Subito vado da un altro veterinario in piena notte per una visita. Mi dà una terapia sintomatica ed intanto fa il test della leshmaniosi a cui Brigitta risulta positiva. Intanto Brigitta ha febbre, spasmi, non cammina e piange appena la si muove, così mi mandano in una clinica specializzata. La porto tra mille lamenti di dolore, entra in clinica in barella e rimane lì dove peggiora giorno dopo giorno ed alla fine non scodinzolava neanche più quando la andavo a trovare come se non mi riconoscesse.
In clinica fa radiografie, Tac ed esami del sangue dove confermano la positività alla Leishmaniosi.
Continua la cura con i farmaci per la Leishmania ed ogni giorno sta sempre peggio, chiamo Marco Polettini che è il mio veterinario dei cavalli ed anche un amico. Lui pensa che per come stanno evolvendo le cose forse sarebbe meglio dimetterla e curarla tentando un approccio diverso visto che la cagnetta sta sempre peggio. Dice che la sintomatologia nella sua evoluzione può sovrapporsi a quella di una meningite infettiva. Vedendo il suo stato di ormai quasi completa paresi la faccio dimettere.
Il trasporto è stato un massacro… non riuscivo a guidare perchè si lamentava, allora mi dovevo fermare. Ci ho messo 3 ore per fare 50 km ed arrivare a casa. Marco l’ha messa sotto terapia per la meningite con la doxyciclina ed il suo protocollo terapeutico annesso ed in un secondo momento gli ha inoculato staminali da sangue autologhe.
Piano piano, nei giorni… Brigitta ha iniziato prima a scodinzolare, poi di nuovo a mangiare, infine si è alzata, ha cominciato a muoversi e ad evacuare da sola.”
Dopo 10 giorni dal ritorno a casa è stato fatto il primo trattamento con le staminali del sangue e la vedete nella prima parte del video che cammina e zoppica vistosamente, nella seconda parte del video Brigitta ha ricevuto da un mese la seconda dose di staminali e la sua zoppia, come lo stato generale, ha subito un ulteriore notevole miglioramento.
“Oggi, dopo tre mesi ha ricominciato a giocare con le lucertole, è migliorata come carattere e ci sta sempre vicino…se è ancora con noi dipende dal fatto che ho avuto la forza di intraprendere una terapia diversa, mentre sarebbe stato più comodo disinteressarmi di lei sperando in un miracolo.
GRAZIE MARCO E ALLE STAMINALI DEL SANGUE.”
La storia di questo cane mostra come sia frequente la sindrome di Lyme anche in questi animali.
Brigitta, la boxer di Sabina, aveva mostrato una sintomatologia che era passata da quella ortopedica a quella neurologica abbastanza repentinamente e la terapia, giustamente in linea con la medicina di oggi, era stata sintomatica e rivolta all’artrosi e dopo ai sintomi neurologici ed alla forma infettiva che risultava dalle analisi cliniche, la Leishmaniosi.
Provando a dare a questi sintomi un denominatore comune, cioè sospettando come causalità infettiva primaria la sindrome di Lyme e considerando la Leishmania come una coinfezione siamo riusciti se non a guarire completamente, per lo meno a migliorare la cagnetta e di conseguenza a salvargli la vita con l’antibiotico d’elezione per il morbo di Lyme: la doxyciclina, insieme al protocollo terapeutico articolato verso questa sindrome, protocollo che continuiamo a migliorare negli anni.
Infine abbiamo usato le staminali per agire su quella parte di Sistema nervoso Centrale degenerato e per stimolare il sistema immunitario affinchè riconoscesse ed attaccasse il biofilm in cui si annidano i batteri che producono il morbo di Lyme.
La terapia fatta in clinica era una terapia coerente con l’attuale paradigma della medicina, indirizzata ai sintomi, per cui oggi ineccepibile, ma in questo caso specifico il miglioramento non era avvenuto ed il cane peggiorava giorno dopo giorno. La risoluzione è avvenuta cambiando la prospettiva terapeutica, sospettando una causalità la cui diagnosi è difficilmente confermabile da un’analisi del sangue.
Questo episodio dimostra come la sindrome di Lyme oggi è una realtà di notevole vastità, se non una vera pandemia, ed anche noi esseri umani ne siamo soggetti perchè può essere trasmessa in molti modi oltre che dalla zecca. La sindrome di Lyme ha come componenti infettive di base le Borrelie e le Bartonelle a cui si aggiungono varie co-infezioni dovute alla diminuzione di efficienza del sistema immunitario creato da questi batteri che odiano essere intralciati nelle loro attività. Infatti per loro il sistema immunitario rappresenta la “polizia”.
Per darvi un esempio della vastità di possibilità di contaminazione vi faccio qualche esempio: alcuni anni fa mi portarono un boxer con una paresi progressiva, nell’anamnesi venne fuori un particolare che per gli altri veterinari era insignificante. Due giorni prima di cominciare a paralizzarsi il cane era stato punto da un grosso ragno nero e peloso (probabile il tipo di vedova nera che vive in Italia e che si trova frequente in Maremma) è probabile che anche questo parassita possa trasmettere questi batteri… Un giorno un mio amico mi parlò di suo padre che da 10 anni soffriva di una dermatite gravissima per la quale era stato anche ricoverato in ospedale e, nonostante la terapia, da anni non dormiva e si grattava a sangue. Lo portai da Guido, il medico che si occupa dei bipedi con Lyme, e venne fuori che due giorni prima che si manifestassero i sintomi era stato punto sul collo da uno scorpione. Guido testò con la chinesiologia la doxyciclina, la ricettò e con il suo protocollo completo mise fine a dermatite e grattamenti. A questo aggiungiamo una signora che mi chiamò per telefono dicendo che suo fratello soffriva di una demenza progressiva da 20 anni, emisi il sospetto di Lyme perché il malato era stato punto da un calabrone vicino all’occhio e da lì erano cominciati i suoi guai… infatti lo operarono del tumore che si era formato nell’occhio dopo la puntura dell’insetto che si era dimostrata un carcinoma e da lì il proseguire della sintomatologia neurologica. Gli consigliai di fare il western blot test e la signora portò il fratello in Germania dove diagnosticarono una neuro-borrelliosi, cioè Lyme.
Un altro caso riguarda il figlio di una mia amica che era stato pizzicato da un gallo ed aveva sotto l’occhio un’escrescenza che si riformava nonostante fosse stato operato più di una volta, il bambino aveva anche una forma comportamentale patologica. Lo mandai da un medico che faceva la bio-risonanza e trovò che era presente la bartonella nella lesione. Diede la terapia al bambino che guarì definitivamente e inoltre cambiò in meglio il suo carattere. Per cui anche il becco di un gallo può portare la sindrome di Lyme, del resto la Bartonellosi è conosciuta anche come la malattia del graffio del gatto al quale bastano le sue unghie e le sue pulci per creare patologie d’ogni sorta comprese quelle neurologiche gravi negli esseri umani.
Vi riporto un altro caso, questa volta ortopedico in un cavallo: un cavallo da salto importante era affetto da sindrome navicolare (una malattia gravissima del piede) il proprietario era un professore umano in ortopedia. Feci l’anestesia diagnostica tra la seconda e la terza falange ed il cavallo che aveva una zoppia 4 su 5 cioè era zoppissimo, smise di zoppicare per cui avemmo la conferma che la zoppia era lì.
Presi il liquido sinoviale e lo feci esaminare dal professore dicendo che sospettavo una linfocitosi (caratteristica di un’infezione da Lyme)… naturalmente era molto scettico ma mi diede retta e dopo alcune ore mi disse che il liquido era pieno di linfociti.
Inoltre il cavallo che avevo trattato con antibiotico nell’articolazione e con ozono come sterilizzante sempre nell’articolazione era migliorato del 90 % in due giorni senza nessuna altra cura. Feci fare la risonanza e trovammo che anche la borsa del navicolare ed un’altra guaina tendinea era stata colpita. Dopo alcuni trattamenti di antibiotico ed ozono completati con le staminali del sangue per perfusione locale e con la doxyciclina per un mese il cavallo è tornato in attività. In quella scuderia una signora, visto che sapeva che curavo i cani oncologici, mi chiese se sapevo qualche cosa del nuovo farmaco scoperto a Pisa per il tumore al seno ed io le dissi che era lo stesso antibiotico che avevo dato al cavallo: la doxyciclina. Mi fermo qui con queste interconnessioni che per me ora sono l’usuale sistema di procedere ma che possono mettere in crisi chi si muove linearmente e vi lascio il tempo di assimilare questa nuova visione.
Infine diciamo questo: la sindrome di Lyme è molto più frequente di ciò che si pensa, è difficile da diagnosticare con esami normali ed anche quando provata la positività i medici non fanno i collegamenti con altre patologie gravi. Oggi a chi è stata diagnosticata come tale risulta limitata a sè stessa e vengono prescritti gli antibiotici e qualche altra cosa per curare dolori, fibro-mialgia e stanchezza cronica.
Ma non è questo il punto: la sindrome di Lyme può predisporre a qualsiasi malattia visto che destabilizza il nostro sistema immunitario. La sindrome di Lyme quando viene individuata non si può sconfiggere in una battaglia ma bisogna fare una vera e propria guerra. Poiché forse non “produce”, ma almeno “predispone” alle malattie neurodegenerative (tutte), alle patologie metaboliche, a quelle ortopediche ed oncologiche, etc.. bisognerebbe diagnosticarla negli stadi iniziali prendendo in considerazione quei sintomi fastidiosi a cui noi esseri umani non diamo tanto peso, come torcicollo, dolore alle spalle e cervicali, mal di testa ricorrenti, dolori articolari, alterazioni della memoria, depressione, etc..
Se invece capiamo di essere affetti da questa patologia precocemente (la maggior parte dei veterinari ne è affetta e non è un caso che sia la professione che ha il maggior numero di suicidi nel mondo) possiamo se non curarla definitivamente almeno limitarla evitando che si sviluppi in patologie gravissime…. Il fatto che hanno trovato nella doxyciclina (unico antibiotico che penetra il biofilm della borrelia) un importante farmaco antitumorale dovrebbe far pensare chi comincia a “percepire” considerando il network e non la linearità.
Ho trasmesso tutte le mie conoscenze veterinarie ad un medico umano, Guido, che ha così acquisito grande esperienza nella diagnosi e nella cura di questa malattia dove la fisica moderna gioca un grosso ruolo, in questa malattia c’è bisogno di una terapia molto articolata visto che, come ho detto sopra, intraprendere la lotta contro il morbo di Lyme non è una battaglia ma una guerra. ... See MoreSee Less
A SHAMAN OF THE THIRD MILENNIO (PART TWO)
A NEW WAY TO CONFRONT INCURABLE DISEASES WITH BLOOD STEM CELLS.
As the concepts we start from to find more new therapeutic solutions using blood stem cells are complex, a greater effort is needed to make them understandable to everyone.
The first thing we need to do is destabilize classical biology a little: it is an established fact that a metabolic process is obtained from many consequential chemical reactions, such as the Krebs cycle, which is a metabolic cycle of fundamental importance in all cells that use oxygen in the cellular respiration process. A metabolic pathway like the Krebs cycle is the set of chemical reactions involved in one or more anabolism or catabolism processes within a cell, responsible for the degradation (catabolism) of carbohydrates, fats and proteins into carbon dioxide and water and the creation of chemical energy.
So the classical biologist is convinced that the secret of life is in chemistry because of this extraordinary and rapid succession of reactions that provide us with free and useable energy.
If, however, curious and intelligent persons knowing nothing about biology found themselves in the situation of having to evaluate this affirmation, they would have the perception that something doesn’t add up... molecule A reacts with molecule B and so on, simple... but given that the Krebs cycle’s goal is to produce energy, how much energy is needed to move and bring the chemical components closer together, the various molecules A,B,C, etc.... that produce the sequence of reactions?
On balance it appears that it’s not worth the bother because the energy needed to bring the useful chemical elements into contact in the Krebs cycle can use up more energy than that obtained from their reaction. But don’t think that this stops people who aren’t biologists, in fact they pose yet another question to destabilize the biologists’ convictions: how does molecule A “quickly” find molecule B and then how does the molecule obtained from this reaction find molecule C with the same speed?
If the contact were random, one would have to wait for the two predestined molecules to meet and this could take too long for the organism that can’t wait for the "the year of never" in order to breathe.
Therefore by posing these two naive questions, the older generation of biologists, who classify as scientific only what mechanistic physics asserts, are put into great difficulty. In this physics, that of Galileo and Newton, reality is depicted as a set of immobile, separate objects, that can move, encounter and produce reactions only when they are pushed or pulled, that is, when a set of forces enters into the game. To change their state it takes a force for which some energy is necessary, so if the living organism, which is a set of molecules that perform many actions together, worked according to the principles of classical physics, it would pay an enormous energy bill ... therefore it cannot be so.
To respond to a naive person’s simple and destabilizing questions, modern physics comes to our aid, which differs from classical physics in this: an object ...an atom, does not present itself as an immobile element in nature but has its own movement. In this physics the principle of inertia fails because all bodies in the universe fluctuate spontaneously, therefore it is impossible to separate matter from movement in that it is not inert but moves, is agitated.
In my work as a horse orthopaedist I never separate matter from movement, in fact an anatomical lesion in 90% of cases is not due to an occasional event, but caused by a repetitive movement linked to that animal’s particular biomechanics. So to produce a therapeutic action I have to act simultaneously on both the anatomical damage and the movement that provoked it, the diagnosis also becomes easier because by asking the rider information about the "movement" I can more easily establish the lesion that is directly connected to it. It should be logical to anyone that "tennis elbow" manifests itself in the arm that the individual uses to hold the racket. You can see that even in the equine orthopaedic profession the philosophy of linearity is abandoned in order to embrace that of interconnection. Another example I can give you is this: a few days ago a colleague sent me to see a 23 year-old horse, one morning it began to show lameness by not using its rear symmetrically. My colleague suspected a fracture of the pelvis and had done an ultrasound with questionable results and wanted to know what I thought. When I came to see the horse its gait made me think of a traumatic injury. Asking the owner how the symptomatology had evolved she told me that on the same day of the suspected trauma the horse had started to turn continuously on itself in its stall and it was difficult to stop it. In the light of this "movement" revelation it is very likely that the horse had had a cerebral ischemia, which showed itself in the "backwards" gait and the repetitive circular movement. So the pathology was neurological... if it had been a fracture the horse would have remained motionless in the box to avoid increasing pain. In this case the clinical diagnosis was made by adding to the anatomical evaluation of the musculoskeletal system, the evaluation of its movement and the latter revealed the nature of the pathology. A photon can manifest itself as a particle or a wave because matter and movement are always interconnected.
Modern physics has shown us that there is no need to spend energy to move molecules that already have their own movement. But it doesn't do just this ... it also explains how molecules can quickly find themselves in order to react. In fact, this affirms that oscillations are not independent of another body’s fluctuations and that when these coincide, that is, they put themselves into "phase", the chaotic agitation of the matter turns into a ballet, a concert. It is the Quantum field theory, the theory of resonance, but we’ll go slowly and return to the above statements.
Newtonian physics, the one accepted by medicine, considers any object immobile and isolated and can move only if a force is applied to it, that is, if we give it a push. Now if we had to give a boost to all those molecules in the human body, the energy requirement would be extremely high even after just a few minutes of activity. It is obvious then that there must be another solution that began to take shape in the early 1900s with Relativity and then with quantum physics for which each object is not inert but has its own motion, each body, whether it is an atom or an elephant, swings, floats and resounds.
Each object is immersed in a "quantum vacuum" that is not a vacuum, but a magnetic field that is a continuous oscillation. Imagine a boat that has its own linear route movement to reach an established place, but its linear movement is also influenced by drift and leeway, that is by the current and the wind, which produce a continuous oscillation of the sea and, in metaphor, the sea represents the quantum vacuum.
The principles of quantum physics basically tell us that an object coincides with its electromagnetic field and it is this that then puts itself in "phase" with the other magnetic fields and produces a "perfectly tuned symphony". That every object coincides with its magnetic field was a concept already described by Einstein in 1904, but quantum physics made another step with respect to Einstein because it made the physical reality of the electromagnetic field coincide with its fluctuation and its movement, therefore all matter can be described as a field in continuous oscillation. Classical physics is fundamentally a physics of objects, but as in reality everything fluctuates in the quantum vacuum "fields", it can be deduced that it is impossible to isolate a body and therefore the "objective" foundation of classical physics is falsified.
Quantum physics is a physics of relations in which no body can be considered isolated and its object of study is the set of relations that bind bodies and transmit themselves through fluctuations or frequencies. To express this simply it is enough to say that the object cannot exist without its movement therefore they are two realities that must always be considered together. The modern physician has consciously or unconsciously embraced the philosophy of the "relationship", becoming a "synthesizer" by distancing himself from the exasperated "specialized" medicine.
Frequencies translate themselves into the appearance of electromagnetic potentials and the potential spreads itself in space without involving energy transport. Propagation in space without energy is an implication of the new physics that Einstein had grafted but which ended up frightening him. For him the speed limit was given by the speed of light, but with the "phase velocity" of which quantum physics speaks, no energy is transported so the speed can be any, even infinite. I can, in some way, transmit a physical signal with phase velocity with phenomena that violate the causality that is expressed by the linear relationship of contact between object and object and establish a connection between distant objects ... and it is here that telepathy, synchronicity and entanglement take form.
To rebel against these assertions of quantum physics, in 1933 Einstein defined the consequence with the EPR paradox (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) taken from the article written by these three authors, which states that if quantum physics were true it would be possible to establish connection relationships between objects at great distances from each other, thus violating causality, that is, action at a distance would be possible. Einstein, who absolutely believed in the existence of objectivity and in the fact that it was possible to isolate and separate objects, concluded that quantum physics could not be right and that it could only be an approximation.
Instead, physicists now think that the EPR paradox is absolutely right, but the conclusion that quantum physics could not be real is mistaken. Quantum physics is not only real, but it shows that in nature remote action phenomena of the kind assumed, for example, by Jung on the collective unconscious and telepathy, are possible, that never correspond to transport of matter or energy but to "phase transport ".
We have answered the first question about the energy requirement in organic chemical reactions and we have seen that there is only a need for an infinitesimal quantity of energy because everything oscillates and moves without the need for external forces.
Then here we are with the second question formulated by those who are not immersed in a specific research field, a position that allows them to expand and exploit the interconnections.
How is it possible that these chemical molecules meet up so precisely and quickly? In the current view, since they are different from water molecules that give rise to dynamic living, how do these molecules recognize themselves, find each other and meet up? In fact, in biochemical dynamics there are no errors, there are no encounters that give rise to unintended molecular species, whereas in an industrial chemical reactor there are all kinds of encounters, so in addition to the product one wants, waste that is often toxic to the community is also produced.
Del Giudice metaphorically explains this concept by saying that molecules in industrial chemistry are promiscuous and seek relationships with anyone, while in the body they are monogamous and can only react with another molecule developing a linear reaction, thus producing little refuse and waste.
But then there must be a sort of "government" of biochemical reactions, some physical agent that tells the molecules where they must go and who they must meet. We find the answer in the electromagnetic field and in water. Water has a fundamental role in life, our body is made up of about 99% water molecules, only the remaining 1% is made up of molecules diverse from water (proteins, DNA, hormones, vitamins, etc...). Hitherto biologists have studied the 1% and neglected the 99% due to the preconception that biological dynamics are governed by chemistry, that is by this 1% of molecules that meet up and make chemical reactions. To describe this Del Giudice uses another lovely metaphor depicting the water molecules as the 60,000 spectators at a football game watching the 22, the other molecules, playing.
To get our answer we must also consider the role of the electromagnetic field. In fact there is a theorem that says that when an electromagnetic field occupies a certain region of space in which everything oscillates at the frequency of that field, it is able to attract molecules in that region that oscillate at the same frequency (or at very similar frequencies). There is therefore a selective recall mechanism.
Water is the element that allows the realization and variation of the electromagnetic field.
Water molecules are capable of having a collective activity, they are not a crowd of independent objects, but they are like a corps de ballet, that is, they give rise to an order and "move" in a definite way. Since magnetic fields are produced by oscillations of electric charges, an oscillation of a large number of molecules in phase gives rise to a well-defined electromagnetic field. Here is the origin of the electromagnetic field that acts as a regulator and so we return to the metaphor of Del Giudice’s soccer game whereby the role of the 60 000 spectators in the stadium who by shouting “olè olè olè” (produce an electromagnetic field), induce the 22 players to play better.
Many people, not just the most convinced Newtonians, have attacked Jacques Benveniste’s assertions on the characteristics of water and especially on its "memory". But while the crowd of detractors continued to rage on what they considered to be the inconsistent quality of water, in 2008, Luc Montagnier was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine for his experimental expertise on viruses and DNA, this scientist demonstrated through an experiment that everything Benveniste had said about water was real.
Montagnier placed some sequences of bacterial DNA into a test tube containing pure water then he gradually diluted it with more water, a coil was placed to take the electromagnetic signals coming from the test tube. One very…very...important thing, which we will take up again in the therapeutic protocol of blood stem cells, is the fact that the more the solution was diluted, i.e. the more the water was increased, the more the recorded electromagnetic signals increased. So it was water that regulated the energy intensity of the solution and not the dissolved substances, in fact the more the solution was diluted instead of energy being lost it was increased. Imagine it like this: the DNA, the chemical substance, is the Beatles singing in a concert and water is the loudspeakers, the volume of the song does not depend on the Beatles but on the number of speakers.
Therefore water can oscillate on a large number of frequencies, but it is the occasional partner of water, in this case the bacterial DNA (the Beatles), which establishes what frequencies (the track) are recorded in the coil. That is, the bacterial DNA transmitted information and the water recorded it and was able to reproduce it and amplify it.
All this confirmed Benveniste's famous experiments, but Montagnier went further, in fact the second part of the experiment is the most bewildering: the signals were sent to a second vessel containing pure distilled water and, to avoid doubts of contamination, the process was done also via computer hundreds of kilometres away.
The experimenters added to the pure water the substances necessary for the structuring of DNA, adenine, thymine, cytosine and guanine, plus the necessary catalysts, polymerases, etc.... and what happened? After a certain number of hours (about 20 hours) the same type of DNA physically appeared as that from which the signal was extracted!!!
The response of the rapid and precise linking of chemical reactions is in the electromagnetic field produced by water. And, explaining it in the easiest way possible, each electromagnetic field is a coherence domain with a specific frequency and two molecules A and B, with the same frequency as the field, are attracted by the field, so they meet and react. At this point the new molecule formed by the reaction between A and B, which we will call C, this will have a different frequency and will be attracted by the molecule D which will have its same frequency and the reaction will take place in the coherence domain of a new magnetic field. Of course, many coherence domains are formed which, in principle, are independent of each other, but can enter into "phase" and become coherent. This leads to bringing two molecules closer without using a force to drag them or wait for the encounter to be causal. In this first case there would be an unsustainable consumption of energy and in the second case biblical times for chain reactions.
The biology way of thinking is linked to the concept that every biological act is ascribable to a sequence of chemical reactions and it is undeniable that there is a chemical foundation in living matter. But if in the sequence of chemical reactions at some point something goes wrong there must be a capacity for self-correction that avoids causing us one illness after another. So the encounters do not happen by chance and if an error occurs there must be a conscious system to fix them.
Modern physics and the characteristics of water allow us to understand that disease is linked to oscillations, to the movement that is expressed in the non-correct succession of an organism’s physiological chemical reactions. Therefore the pathology is due to incorrect information recorded and expressed by the water.
Here it is important to stop for a moment and understand the thinking of modern physicists who are convinced that the physics of Galileo and Newton is a physics that has need of a Creator because there must be something that pushes or gave the primordial push. While current physics is convinced of the self-regulation of living matter therefore does not need a Creator and modern physicists can also declare themselves atheists.
When a journalist asked Del Giudice if thought can transfer information to the water, he replied ... " not only that, but, moreover, water can generate thought and gives us a first idea of how inside of matter, when coherence exceeds certain thresholds, cognitive phenomena can be generated. Water can produce structures within itself that have a meaning, it can give rise to oscillation phenomena that are not random and contain a cognitive structure, a mining. What this means we do not know yet, what we certainly know is that the network of electromagnetic water signals is not random but is a producer of meanings, whatever that means. Thought is the equivalent of Montagnier's signals referring to our brain cells, so it will be the output of a complex biological process, like the one studied by neuroscientists. If we transfer thought to water, probably the latter, at least in part, will reproduce those same processes that we have seen realized in Montagnier’s experiments, this because thought is a set of electromagnetic waves suitably connected to each other."
Personally, I accept only the certainty that water can transcribe and even modify, but not create information. The information "of the living organism" that we are talking about differs from the information that artificial intelligence, like that of a computer, possesses, in fact if in the latter we activate a search engine to obtain the translation of the word " saucepon " we don’t get an answer because the computer does not have that organic quality of modifying the concept of “saucepon”" into saucepan. "Organic" water instead has a sort of "free will" which we can imagine similar to that of human beings, this allows it to modify informative stimuli. Human beings can record, transmit information and make decisions, but they are not the architects of life, therefore water, which has characteristics similar to humans, does not have this prerogative. If Newton’s physics needed a Creator to give the push by applying a force to the inert substance, also quantum physics has not found the self-generation system through water. The water in an organism undergoes informative energy action and the Creator uses this energy to transform organic chaos into order. Informative energy is the means that the Creator uses to create life leaving a kind of free will so that everything is probabilistic and not certain.
Informative energy spreads and pervades all of creation without the need to move energy, to concentrate it we need a very high coherent electromagnetic field and it is conceivable that totipotent stem cells, capable of producing an entire organism, possess such a field, obviously tuned-in to that particular organism of which they contain the essence. These cells then transmit their coherence to the entire blood subsystem in which they are contained, increasing the potential resonance. It is therefore obvious that results without side-effects will come from stem cells belonging to the same individual to whom they will be re-inoculated because there is no conflict of information.
I’ll try to make these last statements clear by returning to them. The functionality and health of an organism is proportional to the "dance" or the "symphony" coherence that produces and depends on the coherent superimposition of that organism’s magnetic fields which record and transmit information. This functionality is linked to coherence information and its transmission. Autologous totipotent adult stem cells that have the characteristic of "precursors" of every other cell, therefore contain the information of all the cells of that organism, will have greater coherence with respect to mesenchymal stem cells that possess the ability to generate some tissues only. The coherence of a single monopotent stem cell, for example the one that can only interact with skin cells, will transmit a minor consistency. Therefore the direction to differentiation, the search for a specialized stem cell for a single task that regenerative medicine has taken today, is in contradiction with the laws of modern physics. It’s obvious that every time one speaks about "specialized" one generates conflict with Nature that is "interconnected".
The second point I want to return to is the ability of water to record and transmit information. Totipotent or precursor cells contain water molecules with very high coherence that have recorded the total information of that organism and are able to retransmit it. If any stem cell with its own coherence is cultured or only nourished with an organic liquid that does not belong to the organism from which the cell comes, it will develop a conflict of coherence or at least will have much greater difficulty in making the unrelated water molecules resonate as they already have inherent related coherence. If I put our "precursor stem cells " in a bovine culture broth with water that will have "bovine" consistency I will have many more problems in transmitting information with respect to a subsystem composed of autologous whole blood whose water will acquire the information, transmit it and amplify that already present, in a very short time. If we add oxygen to this subsystem and therefore electrons, we increase the number of pages on which water can transcribe, implementing its recording and transmission characteristics.
When an organism functions well its coherence is very high, it does not manifest diseases and, in the case of human beings, its thinking is fast and full of intuitions. But just as each engine wears out with time so too will informative energy and the coherence of the organism’s magnetic fields lose efficiency over the years. Old age brings with it the most serious diseases and modern medicine tries to buffer the deficiencies in a timely manner, but in plugging one hole after another it’s inevitable that one eventually arrives at a state of collapse.
Therefore the subsystem of totipotent stem cells from blood will have an easier task on incidental pathologies such as traumatic ones or on systemic ones of a young individual who already possesses considerable informative energy that will just be redirected by the subsystem.
I’ll try to explain it this way: a relatively serious pathology produces jarring notes in the organism's symphony, so the coherent information of the "blood stem cell subsystem" has the relatively easy task of increasing the symphony’s volume by reabsorbing the "flat notes". If the organism maintains a certain degree of coherence it does not allow the pathology to go beyond the jarring, allowing the reversibility of the pathology, a phenomenon that will be simplified by the "subsystem’s” regenerative therapy.
When, on the other hand, the pathologies are more serious and this occurs more frequently in old age, in intoxications and chronic infections, the organism’s coherence is greatly diminished and the pathologies are no longer "false notes" of the same symphony, but are "diverse symphonies” from that of the organism. Therefore a single therapeutic act with the subsystem with any informative energy "voltage" will not suffice. The common denominator of diseases such as cancer or neurodegenerative ones is often, but not always, aging, and in order to "re-enter" they need informative energy with very active and functional electromagnetic fields. Remember when I focused your attention on the Montagnier experiment that claimed that the magnetic field increased in proportion to water dilution.... Taking advantage of this reality for the most serious pathologies I have theoretically modified the therapeutic protocol. I say "theoretically" because I do not have the economic and logistic possibility of being able to produce the many theoretical variations in a large-scale clinical trial, but only in the small way that I am doing. It is important to always have new insights and the strength to begin to develop them because it is from these that progress comes, of course they are never completely right, but from the tenacious and diligent review of errors the theory progresses and that doesn’t make one feel one has "arrived", but is on the springboard "moving" towards new adjustments.
For now conventional therapies, both medical and psychological, including blood stem cells, are based, even if not always consciously, on the opinion that the response of a living organism is proportional to the stimulus received. On the contrary, there are important trends in the history of therapies that attribute a decisive role to very light stimuli for the reorganization of an organism, where much greater stimuli have less or no importance.
The essential importance of small stimuli, rather than large stimuli, in strengthening the self-regulating and self-healing capacity of the living organism has been learnt from clinical practice. From this examination the role played by that physical variable called "phase" has emerged, which in physicists’ jargon corresponds to the oscillation rhythm, with respect to the energy exchange, generally considered the fundamental element of the living being’s dynamics.
Indeed conventional medicine considers the action of electromagnetic fields on living organisms to be negligible because the intensity of these fields is usually below certain minimum levels. Instead important evidence exists that in therapy these fields attach value to very slight stimuli for the reorganization of an organism, where much greater stimuli have less or no importance.
Despite the "sacrilegious" appearance of these tendencies they are found to be much more in agreement with a physiology founded on the reality of modern physics compared to the trends of conventional medicine.
“Already in the mid-nineteenth century, classical physiology was moving in this direction and had been able to establish a valid relationship between stimulus and response for all living species. It is the law of Weber and Fechner which establishes the proportionality of the response, not to the stimulus but to the logarithm of the stimulus." Simply put, for us non-mathematicians, there is a threshold of non-response which in the mathematical formula is indicated with"S0 "which is a stimulus value for which the answer is null. When "S", the magnitude of the stimulus, is greater than So the answer is positive i.e. it is facing outward (if my knee is hit by a hammer I react with a kick ) and this response entity grows much slower than the stimulus entity, which is very useful for protecting the body from too large stimuli. In our case, if we inoculate a large dose of autologous stem cells, after a certain threshold the reaction no longer shows any change in effects. Hence if on the one hand it inhibits the side effects due to the inoculation of a high number of stem cells, on the other hand the results are not directly proportional to the stem cells introduced nor to the rapidity of infusion (for example intravenous and not intramuscular).
What is rather amazing is that when the stimulus S is smaller than the threshold stimulus So, the response entity grows with the decrease of S, but acquires the negative sign, that is, a response not facing outwards, but towards the interior; in other words the organism acts on itself, it restructures itself, it reorganizes itself, the more smaller the entity of the stimulus is.
Let's imagine it this way: I'm on a motor boat, I accelerate powerfully and produce a thrust forward of the motorboat (the knee hit by the hammer), but if I continue with the engine revving so high, the foot of the outboard motor comes out of the water and the propeller turns idly, causing “cavitation" where the propeller is in contact with a gas and not with a liquid ... an exasperated "external" effect, of no use in the production of an effective motion and if it is not interrupted can cause the engine to fail. If instead after a first acceleration we reduce the propeller revs the action will be "internal" to the liquid system, the water in which the boat is immersed and the low rev motion propels the boat forward
Therefore, after an initial high quantity dose of inoculated cells, a repeated low dosage action of these can, for a few days, rebalance the internal coherence deficit of the vital energy which was the primary cause behind the manifestation of a serious pathology such as cancer, ALS or other irreversible degenerative diseases. These pathologies have coherence diverse and in contrast with that of the organism and only by gently reactivating the oscillation of organic coherence with "internal action" will it be possible to gradually eradicate them.
Here therefore, is a rational basis for the formulation of the principle of minimum stimulus: the smaller the stimulus, the greater the potentiality of the organism to reform and reorganize itself, which is precisely the aim of every therapy.
Maybe I can to be even clearer with another metaphor: one hundred mice threaten the house supplies so a hungry cat is brought in which reactivates the house’s defences by creating panic in the group of mice that take refuge in their nest. This happens after the first high-dose stem cells’ inoculation to treat a serious disease. But after a first regression, the reaction of high cell doses repeated monthly is always more ephemeral. The mice realize that the cat is brought into the house every 30 days so they start to raid the supplies again. What could happen if we added to this technique (positive because initially the pathology regressed) a stimulus of the same nature, but bland and suffused like the continuous diffusion of a soft and constant mewing produced by some loudspeakers in the house? There would be a stimulus below the action threshold produced by the "virtual" coherence of the cat element that would confine the mice to their nest gripped by the terror that is not of the flesh and blood cat, but of its coherence. Similarly could repetitive doses of autologous blood stem cells below the threshold effect destroy the coherence of cancer or another incurable disease? Indeed if two colonies of cancerous and non-cancerous stem cells are hybridized it is always the healthy tissue colony that is prevalent. By constantly comparing the two coherences in vivo and by reactivating the organic coherence with a low stimulus in a real incurable pathology, it is conceivable that in some cases one can have an almost definitive remission.
From this modern image of medicine and biology we can derive a different therapy assigning a new role to regenerative medicine. The therapeutic theory of the "blood stem cell subsystem" is confirmed in veterinary with the results obtained on pathologies that depend on the organism’s jarring physiological symphony; we still have to define it for those diseases that are not jarring but completely different songs, which resonate in the body creating a very serious pathological oscillation conflict.
In the new paradigm of medicine and biology water is a special element, but it is inaccurate to talk about water memory because the term memory indicates something static while water information has characteristics of dynamism and change. With a simple explanation, for those of us who are not theoretical physicists, this happens because water possess some electrons that are not completely bound to water, we say that they are on "probation", a prerogative that gives them the ability to form energy vortexes which are the "attractors" that create electromagnetic fields. Vortexes that contain information and have no friction whereby movement and therefore the "information recording” lasts for a very long time and moreover they have the ability to modify it with the possibility of adding ever new information into the same vortex with continuous alteration of the magnetic fields.
We have perceived, if not really understood, the concept of dance, of melody that pervades the organism and also all of creation. We have an idea of an informative and vital energy contained in the blood stem cells that moves everything and its role of bringing the "coherence jarring" back into the organism to which they belong. The milder and more superficial the disease is, the easier this will be.
But we know that there are serious diseases that are not caused by jarring cells but are foreign to the coherence of that organism, cells that sing another song or dance their own choreography.
The organism originates from stem cells that modify their functional activity during the evolution of the organism. They will change their characteristics from embryo to fetus to baby, child, adolescent and adult, acquiring specialized functions related to various organs and tissues. Their role is to produce growth and to organize, but if they incur radical changes, known as epigenetic mutations, their coherence changes and they produce tissues with other characteristics ...thus a different organism is formed within the original organism. This phenomenon is evident in serious pathologies such as cancer, ALS and other degenerative diseases, in the first case one sees a hyper cellular growth, in the others a growth reduction or degeneration.
In cancer the stem cell epigenetic mutations that make them "cancer stem cells" are many and administrating the "blood stem cells subsystem" in the dogs with cancer that I treat leads to an initial evident regression of the process, a sort of freezing of the carcinogen evolution, a partial regression of the masses and a partial encapsulation. This status, if well assisted by a supportive therapy, can give noticeable improvements above all in the quality of life.
However, this approach must always be supported by therapeutic action on the multi-factorial causalities that have created the pathology and by the various forms of cyto-reduction (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and biological therapies).
These serious pathologies are always "fractal diseases" that is, composed of multiple causalities that constitute the "attractors", namely, the magnets that produce the new magnetic fields of the disease. Raising the correct oscillation with the stem cells subsystem blocks the recent "newly formed parasitic organism" for a period but when the informative wave declines a serious pathology such as a tumour or Parkinson's, which initially remained blocked, resumes its course outside of the organic coherence. This is the same limit of cyto-reduction and biological therapies aimed at blocking an epigenetic mutation of carcinogenic stem cells, in fact none of these therapies, including high repetitive doses of the subsystem, are able to eliminate the abnormal coherence of a "serious" disease.
So we must try to change the basic strategy and at the same time involve everything that can be useful in defeating an incurable disease such as cancer where the final solution is still far away.
Let's try out another theoretical cancer therapy path that could open up new opportunities. We start from the awareness that we are facing a multi-factorial pathology that through our new knowledge of physics we could define "fractal" that is, composed of numerous causalities that behave as attractors and give rise to the pathology. The tumour can be due, for example, to an infectious pathology such as Lyme syndrome, this inhibits the immune system which also has the role of eliminating the carcinogenic stem cells in circulation. The immune system deficiency can also facilitate co-infections, such as mononucleosis from Epstein Barr virus on which many leukemias seem to depend. So in this specific case the bacteria involved in Lyme syndrome and the Epstein Barr virus are two attractors that produce the tumour and the fact that doxycycline therapy, which I have been using for years in dog oncological pathologies, has been recognised as being important in human medicine tumour therapy, confirms my thesis. If we consider that Borrelia and Bartonella, bacteria directly involved in Lyme syndrome, need calcium to form the biofilm, the bacterias’ refuge against the immune system, it results obvious that they will act on reducing the calcium-fixing vitamin D that brings calcium to the bones, because the bacteria need it in the blood to build a "home". Vitamin D enters the signalling cycle that regulates the "normal" cell growth and lack of it predisposes to tumour, in fact today every cancer patient’s blood is checked for vitamin D values and in the frequent cases of deficiency, it is introduced. So the lack of vitamin D must be considered an oncological "attractor" too.
Wrong diet, insulin resistance, unhappiness and a sense of dissatisfaction, refusal to integrate into the collective oscillation of humanity, microbiome imbalance, intoxication, viruses, bacteria, immune and metabolic deficiency etc., these are just some of the attractors that lead to the establishment of an "organism within an organism" through the anomalous informative energy of "carcinogenic" or "degenerative" stem cells.
In the new therapy we must try hard to identify these causalities and attempt to eliminate them or at least reduce them. Cyto-reduction techniques and the various natural therapeutic approaches are not the objective of this study, but the latter, in the light of new knowledge introduced by modern physics, can be united by exploiting water’s electromagnetic fields and optimizing their activation through the introduction of oxygen electrons.
What I propose today is only a theory with the task of opening up new ways to inhibit and counteract the oncological and degenerative coherence present in an organism and the solution could lie precisely in the minimum stimulus theory with a new procedure for using the subsystem, appropriate for diseases so far considered incurable. A similar approach, already in existence, was introduced by Dr. Pier Mario Biava who, after having ascertained that tumours never form in embryos, thought that embryonic cells produced proteins (prions) that inhibited their formation. Therefore by exploiting the memory of water, he produced a diluted pharmacological aid based on embryonic fish cells. By changing his theoretical approach, i.e. replacing the tumour inhibiting proteins with informative energy and using autologous stem cells not embryonic fish cells, one can complete his theory and the results could be better.
Leaving aside any type of cancer therapy, it is essential to "reason preventatively" and since the first causality of a tumour is the age related lack of informative energy, the anti-age therapy of the blood stem cells subsystem is the best cancer prevention and given that even thought is affected by informative energy, all cognitive deficiencies and forms of acquired dementia that occur with age can improve or be prevented through the subsystem.
What has been written above has upset current regenerative medicine which includes that being used today in orthopaedics, namely mesenchymal stem cells and growth factors that have good results but nothing near the results obtained with the subsystem also in this sector. The difference will be clearer to you if I explain it this way: mesenchymal stem cells interact with bone cells, cartilage, tendons, ligaments, etc., but do not interact with the nervous system. Now what organizes healing in every tissue is the autonomic nervous system and therefore interacting with this, as blood stem cells do, improves both the time and quality of healing even in an orthopaedic pathology.
However, every form of regenerative medicine destabilizes the usual healing system, so it will obviously be opposed. Not being able to deny the positive orthopaedic results of mesenchymal stem cells in orthopaedics, this methodology is disputed by bureaucracy and "authority control". Another strategy of the "current medical system" is to support complicated and very expensive procedures to produce and use stem cells, such as obtaining neural stem cells and surgically introducing them into the central nervous system, in this case the therapy would be applicable to a small number of patients due to stratospheric costs and would not influence today's medicine paradigm and indirectly the "profit" that derives from it.
Moreover regenerative medicine has been demonized ad hoc by a campaign against those who have used stem cells to treat genetic or neurological pathologies using inadequate cells and techniques, producing gain without obtaining any significant results, and here is the reason for the media attacks on "Stamina" that first in Italy then in the Ukraine caused criticism due to its inadequacy. In fact, the strategy implemented by that company was the worst that could be created to block the development of regenerative medicine by influencing public opinion that had been conditioned to lump everything together.
Our regenerative medicine technique has taken a different path, never considered before, and uses the new theoretical physics’ knowledge that leads to a therapy that exploits the informative energy contained in the electromagnetic fields of qualifiable and quantifiable autologous stem cells. A therapeutic system that is not feasible in a classical experiment for the real and unquestionable probability of each complex "disease/patient" evolution. The goodness of such a procedure, however, is unequivocally confirmed by the improvements that occurred in diseases still considered difficult to resolve today.
This will inevitably be the medicine of the future because we were lucky enough to have found the ignition keys for regenerative medicine that has always been considered a Ferrari, but so far nobody was able to get it out of the garage and put it on the road. It is true that it will lead to a conflict with the old system, but the future is the future and no one will be able to stop it, moreover the discovery’s Image value, for whoever develops it, is far superior to the economic one.
Having acquired these new concepts, we will briefly return to the microbiome concept.
The organism is made up of organic and bacterial cells and from the interaction of their electromagnetic fields the coherence of every organism takes shape.
In the microbiome the types and number of bacteria are important, this depends on the diet and the amount of prebiotics, which are none other than the vegetables used to feed these bacteria.
The greater the number and variety of microorganisms are, the better our microbiome and our health will be.
In dysbiosis a change of food with prebiotics must be gradual to avoid exaggerated fermentation. The use of probiotics (a relative number of good bacteria contained in a commercial pack) can have the therapeutic effect of a drug, that is, it can have a timely action that one needs in that moment of dysbiosis. In fact, Marco Corti, who produces among the best probiotics on the market, always uses kinesiological techniques to test how long to administer them and teaches this technique to all those who wish to avoid imbalances.
Whereas effective microorganisms (EM) have a different function, they are a cocktail of microorganisms that have their effectiveness not in their number, which is also quite high, but in their coherence. So they are an additional aid in dysbiosis and health in general, but EM are limited too.
Their effectiveness depends on the number and type of bacteria already present in the organism in which information is to be transferred and their aim is to create coherence in the microbiome not just increase the number of bacterial species that compose it. In the event that they succeed in stimulating coherence in the microbiome’s bacteria but the organism’s cells, with which these microorganisms coexist, have lost their vital energy, the dysbiosis remains and health is not recovered. Therefore they will be "effective", in name and in fact, in pathologies of medium severity; they are however essential in serious pathologies when they are used together with the subsystem, in this way the information coherence will be addressed to both organic and bacterial cells. The fact that blood stem cells give information both to the organic cells and the microorganisms that make up the body explains why sometimes only blood stem cells can heal a dysbiosis, but also because it is important to integrate the effective microorganisms’ "informative resonant" action to the new therapy in the treatment of diseases still considered incurable.
As we have said, allogeneic blood types (those of another individual) are contraindicated because they produce an information conflict with serious side effects, so too the microbiome transplant from one person to another is only done in very serious pathologies because in the same way it can create an information conflict between two different microbiomes. The effective microorganisms, which are also used in the agricultural vegetable world, transmit "impersonal" coherence information by activating the microbiota of that organism, while a foreign organic microbiota can create conflict and side effects.
In the end the ingredients for our dysbiosis recipe are simple: prebiotics in the diet, effective microorganisms, probiotics for a limited time and the introduction of the subsystem with its supply of informative energy that orchestrates the whole, creating a dance and a perfect symphony at the same one time. ... See MoreSee Less