0039 336 577266 info@thankstem.it

LE NUOVE FRONTIERE DELLA MEDICINA RIGENERATIVA

Un Libro normalmente si limita ad un solo argomento, mentre questo, avendo come oggetto “l’interconnessione” deve “ampliarsi e sintetizzare”. Chiarificare una conoscenza porta luce a campi adiacenti… ecco perché questo libro sembra non finire mai ed ogni nuovo capitolo è la prefazione di un altro. L’uomo sembra vivere costretto in una bolla di sapone, con […]

Facebook news

2 months ago

Enrica Biagini

Tantissimi cari auguri di buon compleanno ... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook

2 months ago

Antonella Spuntarelli

Buonasera Dottore.
Le sono profondamente grata per aver trattato con le cellule staminali il mio cane che da tempo lamentava una zoppia per una grave displasia all'anca destra.
Ad un mese esatto dal trattamento il recupero e' stato notevole ed e' finalmente libero di correre .
Grazie Grazie di ❤ Dottore e Tanti AUGURI anche da parte di Dodo che ringrazia e saluta con tanto affetto.
... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook

3 months ago

Marco Polettini

CANCER, FREQUENCIES AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE
In my books I have often talked about cancer, a multi-factorial and interconnected pathology that leads to diverse interpretations, reflections and therapies. The increase of knowledge about the phenomena that cause and govern cancer and new viewpoints are the premise of a constructive synthesis aimed at arriving at the solution that is lacking today.
As I have already said, scientists are looking for oncogene particles from which the tumor starts, normally suppressed genes (proto-oncogenes) that can be reactivated when other body conditions are altered. These phenomena occur frequently in our bodies, but are deactivated by an efficient psycho-neuro-endocrine-immune system correlated to a good "vital energy", otherwise we would all suffer from cancer since childhood.
There are three criteria for understanding, at least in part, cancer.
First we have to know that the disease does not come from an alien germ, but from a cell that was normal and then, due to multiple and interconnected causalities, becomes cancerous.
The second criterion is the growth rate. Tumor cells multiply wildly contrary to the slow carefully controlled mitosis of normal cells. The tumor doesn’t respect normal tissues’ "boundary laws" and imperiously invades its neighbours, its cells break up, pass into the blood and create metastatic colonies throughout the body.
The third point is the tumor’s metabolic priority, in fact it greedily takes the best part of all the nutrients circulating in the blood and the healthy part of the body only gets what remains.
Tumors spread and grow, consume all the available food and the body dies.
At this point we are able make a crucial observation. Mitotic speed and metabolic priority are two characteristics of embryonic cells which, however, unlike tumor cells, "regulate" their own rapid growth because they possess self-control.
We could say that cancer cells are aggressive, overbearing and selfish, while the embryonic ones coexist peacefully with the organism that hosts them and are altruistic in fact, every mother glows and is more beautiful during pregnancy.
It is true that embryo and tumor resemble each other, but it’s important to keep this difference in mind: even if the embryo is contained within the mother's body, it’s a complete organism and its growth control and "regulation" come from within itself and not from the adult who hosts it and from whom it comes.
Years ago in Switzerland, G. Andres studied this relationship by implanting frog embryos in various body tissues of adult frogs. Every time the host did not limit itself to rejecting the graft, the embryo degenerated into a highly malignant tumor metastasis. In this case the host's cells influenced and modified the embryonic cells’ rules and they lost control ... it was the host that acted on the embryo causing it to grow abnormally. Normal embryonic growth, coming from mother and fetus cohabitation, is replaced by the war between host and invader. Thus, when using embryonic stem cells in therapy, one more or less gets the same conflicting/pathological effects and in a lesser way the same thing happens when using allogeneic stem cells.
Thus "controlled growth and regeneration" belong to the embryo, as the individual becomes adult and then elderly, control is less clear (also due to lack of vital energy) and the possibility of having a tumor increases. On the evolutionary scale, growth control is less complex in less specialized animals, so it’s easy to maintain control even when they become adults, therefore there is less chance of developing a tumor, in fact salamanders, which are perhaps the least specialized of all terrestrial vertebrates, have an enormous regenerative capacity and are almost cancer free.
The growth and regeneration "control" element is more present in embryos, in small children and in less evolved animals and in fact oncological pathologies are rare in these organisms.
Let’s draw the first conclusions:
- the best growth self-regulation occurs in the embryo;
- in less specialized organisms control is simpler so they rarely get sick and heal and "regenerate" quickly
- in advanced animals control is more complex and, when with age vital energy fades, serious illnesses appear.
If we were to take the Paris-Dakar and our car broke down in the desert, would it be easier to repair it if it had a basic diesel engine like the salamander or a hyper-powerful engine full of control units like the human one?
In my veterinary experience, horse tumors are rarer and respond better to therapies than those of dogs. This cannot depend only on the fact that one is herbivorous and the other is carnivorous, the answer is also in the scale of evolution. Goats, which are less evolved than the horse, have even fewer oncological pathologies and to explain this being due to some bacteria of its intestine is limiting, in fact enriching the microbiome with that of goat has not given the desired results in cancer patients.
But let's return to Becker's experiments on amphibians where it has been shown that a lot of effort is required to induce tumors in laboratory salamanders, while it is easy to induce different types of cancer in adult frogs that have more specialized bodies and regenerate very little.
In 1948 Meryl Rose of the Smith College in Massachusetts decided to verify if the environment of a salamander’s regenerating limb produced by blastema development could control the primitive cancer cells.
She took pieces of a common type of frog kidney tumor and transplanted them to the salamander limbs. These tumors quickly kill animals when they spread out of control. However, when Rose amputated the leg just below or through malignancy normal regeneration followed, blastema formed and the cancer cells de-differentiated completely.
In fact it was seen that when the new limb segment grew, the former frog tumor cells de-differentiated in a similar way to what happened in the blastema. That is, for limb regeneration, normal cells must revert and the blastema is formed, so even the frog's tumor cells, involved and stimulated in the regenerative process, reverted and de-differentiated becoming normal.
Frog cells have nuclei smaller to those of the salamander, so they are easily distinguishable and microscope studies have shown that frog muscle mixed with salamander muscle, frog cartilage inserted into salamander cartilage and more, show no traces of cancer.
This experiment is monumental, extremely important and demonstrates the accuracy of Rose’s hypothesis, namely: the system that controls regeneration could control cancer.
Unfortunately, at the time of Rose's work, biology was still firmly anchored to anti-differentiation and her ideas were partly ridiculed and partly ignored. This vision has curbed cancer research for decades due to the implicit dogma that "cells can no longer revert back", carcinogenesis, like a healthy cell’s acquired specialization, is irreversible: once a cell has become cancerous it always remains a cancer cell.
As long as this point of view was considered absolute truth, the only possible way to cure cancer was to cut or kill cancer cells with chemistry and X rays, with the tragic result of a modest increase in survival rate.
Surgery works ...but not always, only against tumors that still haven’t spread, radiation therapy destroys all tissues and chemotherapy makes no distinction between malignant and healthy cells and tends to preserve carcinogenic stem cells, even the new targeted biological therapy from recombinant DNA has many limits and frequent metastatic side effects. Medicine has turned towards increasingly ferocious therapies in the fight against cancer and we are falling into a sort of Vietnam syndrome: to destroy our enemies, we are killing our friends.
We are saying that tumor therapy should be directed to the "de-programming" of cancer cells obtaining a "re-regulation " - a "return to the origins".
I disclose now that I have not found a solution for cancer, but in animals I have obtained improvements and to make continuous progress one must daily increase one’ knowledge of the factors that lead to tumors and their interconnections. Furthermore we must remember that in Nature there is nothing repeatable so obtaining a healing result in a serious condition is not the rule.
For this the researchers’ task will be to acquire new knowledge and to join the dots ... even if they be distant and seem contrasting.
It is obvious that the primary characteristic of every tumor pathology is the decrease in vital energy, but acting only on this with the blood stem cells subsystem therapy can have significant effects in prevention, but its "basic protocol” used for other pathologies is not enough on its own to normalize "crazy "cells.
Becker had discovered that regeneration cannot take place without nerve control and stimulation, therefore one should expect that the nerves themselves exert a certain controlling action on cancer.
Already in 1920 several experimenters implanted tumors in denervated areas and, without exception, the cancer took root better and grew faster than the controls carried out intact nerves.
The first works on this point were criticized for the fact that denervation might have reduced the circulatory system’s efficiency and this deficit could have improved malignant growth. Then, in the mid-1950s, more sophisticated techniques confirmed that the absence of nerves accelerates tumor growth, while changes in blood supply have no significant effect.
Rose’s conclusions that the phenomena that cause regeneration can control cancer were confirmed in 1962 and 1963 by the experiments carried out by F. Seilern-Aspang and K. Kratochwil of the Cancer Research Institute in Austria. These two researchers also worked on salamanders, but instead of implanting frog tumor cells they induced skin cancer with repeated applications of carcinogenic chemicals as inducing cancer in salamanders is a difficult undertaking.
Thus they applied the carcinogenic substance to the base of the tail, the primary tumor was formed on site and metastases appeared randomly in the rest of the body. Then the tail was amputated leaving the primary tumor intact, this neoplasm disappeared with the tail’s re growth.
Cellular studies have shown that the cells are not dead or degenerated but apparently return to normal skin cells; furthermore, all the metastases disappeared as if they were remotely managed and controlled by the main tumor. The salamander got a new tail and no tumor.
However, if the primary tumor was at a point far from the tail amputation, this action has no effect on the cancer and, even if the tail regenerates, the primary tumor and its branches progress and the animal dies. Hence it was evident that tumor regression depended on the regenerative process.
This research, in combination with that of Rose’s, indicates that the regeneration triggered in an area immediately proximal to a primary tumor can make it regress and return to normal tissue, if it is far away this does not happen.
It is interesting to consider that after the tumor cells are de-programmed into healthy cells, the metastases disappear as if they had always been linked to their source through remote information. Let's make an example: a pharmaceutical house (the primary tumor) produces a vaccine and after producing it gives it to distributors (metastases) who live only by trading in that drug; if later it was proved that the vaccine caused side effects such as autism in a high percentage of vaccinated persons, the billionaire lawsuits made by parents of the affected children would cause the pharmaceutical house to fail and the distributors would also instantly disappear. The elimination of metastases immediately follows the death of the primary tumor as the failure of the pharmaceutical house is followed by the distributors’ disappearance.
Cancer cells’ regression is linked to a regenerative process in the immediate vicinity of the malignant tumor where it implements frequency changes and involves the nervous system in the neuro-epidermal junctions.
At this point we have reported some discoveries that have expanded our knowledge on our road towards the de-programming of cancer cells:
- the blastema, like the subsystem, is formed by primitive cells that produce new vital energy and regeneration,
- the regenerative process changes the polarity of the physiological frequency
- the autonomic sensory nervous system is activated in the neuro-epidermal junction located near the tumor.
Apart from all the other therapies that act on oncological causes that I will mention later, it’s time to repeat myself in order to be clearer and to make a first conjecture on what form the new therapeutic path could take that will lead to tumor resolution and the elimination of the suffering that follows, could take.
- regeneration and blastema influence cancer,
- the subsystem, similar in composition to the blastema, generates new vital energy,
-the cancer cells that produce cancer are cancer stem cells that respond poorly to chemotherapy
-the hybridization of two stem cell colonies, cancerous and healthy, always leads to the formation of healthy colonies, therefore at the end of this process the cancerous stem cells are de-programmed
-it is important to make the regenerative nucleus, that pinpoint rich in progenitor stem cells, interact with neuro-epidermal terminations close to the primary tumor.
-chemotherapy is significant only when a tumor is active because it stops its growth, if the tumor is quiescent and the patient is in remission, the oncologist can only wait for the oncological mitosis to restart in order to begin the chemo again and every tumor recurrence will be more and more serious because every time the chemotherapy resistant carcinogenic stem cells will increase.
From these considerations we could conjecture a therapeutic protocol of this kind:
To counteract the first oncological cause that is the lack of vital energy, a subsystem treatment with autologous blood stem cells can be done systemically once with a high dosage and then lower and continuous dosages to restore vital energy and never let it fall below a certain limit.
Another concomitant approach is the inoculation of the subsystem locally in the neuro-epidermal terminations of the primary tumor.
Naturally this approach can be associated with chemotherapy and the subsystem would also have the possibility of inhibiting the side effects, for example preventing hair loss which is the most obvious side effect even if not the most serious.
However it could happen that despite chemotherapy and the subsystem’s autologous stem cells the tumor continues to grow ... and then what could be done?
In the tumor we witness two organisms’ armed coexistence, the tumor and the host. Healthy autologous stem cells should prevail over cancerous ones, but the host organism has established an armed truce with the cancer by accepting a compromise that allows it to survive.
Well we could inoculate a healthy young individual’s allogeneic stem cells into a primary tumor, both within the mass and in the neuro-epidermal terminations around the tumor, we could thus establish a conflict of information and a war between two organisms that have no relationship with each other or a survival pact, with the result of obtaining healthy cells from the hybridization of cancer stem cells and allogeneic stem cells by de-programming. Once this result is obtained, a continuous therapy should follow with the autologous subsystem and the chip with the autologous stem cells’ frequencies that would avoid the Host Versus Graft Disease produced by allogeneic cells and would have a preventive action on relapses while maintaining high vital energy.
A case of thyroid carcinoma in a horse so treated was completely reabsorbed without relapse, while in the dog it is still to be tried and will probably be more difficult.
The fact that the nervous system is involved in cancer could show that there’s a certain affinity between tumors and neurodegenerative diseases.
Many neurodegenerative pathologies frequently have an infectious triggering causality such as Lyme syndrome, caused by hundreds of bacteria between infections and co-infections, which can locate themselves in the Central Nervous System where the immune system is privileged and therefore less efficient. This pathological condition of the nervous system can also lead to signal disturbances with alteration of the sensory autonomic nervous system and alteration of the neuro-epidermal contacts causing cancer.
These bacteria inhibit the efficiency of the immune system that every day phagocytes a high quantity of cells with oncogen mutations thus avoiding cancer, furthermore they limit the febrile reaction with proliferation of viruses such as Herpes that cannot grow at high temperatures, regarding this an evolutionary line-up has been reported: Lyme syndrome, mononucleosis herpes virus, Epstein Barr, and finally lymphoma.
Therefore since cancer can depend on a deficit of the nervous system it’s obvious that among its causalities there may be psychological problems and people who have bad relationships with their parents or suffering from self-pity, self-disapproval, passivity, a compulsive need for pleasure and above all the inability to get out of a depression after some traumatic event such as the death of a loved one or the loss of a job, have a high risk of developing cancer.
Several doctors have found that one can greatly improve cancer patients with biofeedback, meditation, hypnosis, or visualization techniques. All of this without mentioning Hamer who attributes only psychological motivations to cancer.
Unfortunately, cancer is a disease that has many causes and to behave as unicists in one direction or another in most cases will not lead to a final solution. For this reason, clinics are springing up all over the world where tumor therapy is composed of many approaches because the patient prefers to be raked by a therapeutic machine gun rather than hit with a single bullet. Cancer cannot be treated exclusively with any one of these approaches: vitamins, minerals, bicarbonate, fungi, herbs, pesticides, heavy metal chelation, antibiotics, diet, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immune therapy, biological therapy, surgery, ozone, hyperbaric chamber, antibiotics, frequencies, thermotherapy, laser, homeopathy, acupuncture, correct microbiome restoration, zebrafish embryonic stem cells , potassium aspartate , psychological therapy, hypnosis, etc., but by combining many of these approaches. It’s easy for official medicine to demonize any other approach that is not the "classic protocol" because cancer has many possibilities of being fatal and it’s easy to blame those who have made a different therapeutic choice. To establish that the classic unicist protocol (chemo, radio, biological therapy and surgery) is the only way to go is contradicted by the 200,000 cancer deaths every year in Italy alone. Also the greater survival of patients who are treated in holistic clinics like Hope for Cancer founded by Dr. Antonio Jimenez demonstrates that this is the right path.
However we have decided to add regenerative medicine and the physiological electromagnetic field that has very high frequencies and infinitesimal waves to all these approaches.
The few researchers who have tried so far to use electricity against cancer have used a "kill the enemy" approach. This approach has not brought concrete results and has led to the conclusion that high current electrodes could favour the growth of any pre-existing tumor cells in the electrical pathway and, in fact, areas with high electromagnetic pollution have a larger percentage of cancer cases.
The observation that intense electromagnetic fields can delay cancer in animals is not entirely true. In the experiments that supported this thesis the whole animal was exposed to the field, not just the oncological tissue, and the pulsating field (like any variable magnetic field moment) induces a stress response in the animal and this increases the immune system activity which slows tumor growth. However, the effect of the field specifically targeted on the tumor itself is accelerative.
As for the connection with regeneration processes, two experiments in particular are crying out to be judged.
One should try to reproduce the "electric" environment that occurs in the regeneration around tumors using electrodes, chips or diodes or, as Lakovski did, by immersing the patient in low intensity physiological electromagnetic fields produced by his oscillator, demonstrating the regression of some tumors. This would only involve the introduction of small currents to which the activation of the neuro-epidermal junctions close to the primary cancer should be added.
Vital currents are inherent in the organism but are also produced by radiation that constantly comes to Earth, the cosmic waves, which have a regulatory role on every living organism and Lakovski’s intuition started here. Cosmic waves play an important role on the nervous system which is fundamental for maintaining health and for healing and could be demonstrated and clarified by this observation. Magnetic storms interfere and limit the cosmic radiation that reaches Earth and in conjunction with these storms a neuro-psychological change in psychiatric patients has been noted. Becker noted that during the magnetic storms in the eight psychiatric hospitals he had monitored over 28,000 patients had been hospitalized against the 67 that occurred when the magnetic field was stable.
Of course, such a discovery could only serve as a guide for further investigation, because many factors can determine the conditions that lead a person to seek psychiatric help. However, this study is undoubtedly significant in confirming that the normal terrestrial electromagnetic field plays an important role in maintaining the control of bodily functions within the norm.
This approach with physiological frequencies and subsystem is in agreement with the organism, therefore safer and we hope even more effective. I report what the oncologist Ennio Di Bartolomei says, "The surgeon can cut, remove or reorganize the tissues and sew the wound, but only patients can induce their own recovery."
We must treat tissues with a sure and skilled delicacy, and above all we must do no harm, because we are nothing other than Nature's assistants and regenerative therapy with the blood stem cells subsystem has these requirements.
Textbooks report the basics of scientific medicine: anatomy, biochemistry, microbiology, pathology and physiology and each one deals with an aspect of the human body and its characteristics, but they cannot tell us the how and why it is cured.
So far fragmentation has been the only way to deal with a complexity that seemed overwhelming producing even more specialized specialists, while the new interconnection paradigm leads to the "synthesizer", to the doctors of the future, those who will know how to join the dots....
The reductionist assumption aimed at understanding the parts works for spaceships, computers or other complicated machines, but does not work in the study of living beings, from this comes the widespread demand for holistic medicine for life.
The common sense of this vision is demonstrated by the fact that life tolerates fragmentation very badly and we can absolutely affirm that new discoveries can rarely be made from what we have already fragmented, catalogued and understood. Metaphorically, medicine is taking care of every single tree but forgetting about the forest.
I reiterate the concept that the doctor’s "will" to defeat suffering profoundly influences the outcome of many treatments and the concern shown towards the patient and the patient’s trust towards the doctor leads to success more than the doctor’s technical ability. I always advise my collaborators to not try to convince our customers of the goodness of our approach, but to let them choose what they think is the best therapy for their animal.
From this it can be deduced that the placebo effect is a genuine therapy because we are dealing with a physiological effect of the mind on the body, as real as the wind’s effect on a tree.
In my profession as a veterinary doctor I realized that textbooks lacked a chapter, that of interconnection that seeks to bind the whole and help doctors understand the harmony of the body they are trying to heal. In this book I have tried to answer these questions:
What unifies an organism, making every cell subject to the needs of the whole?
How does it happen that the whole being is able do things that none of its components could do separately?
I have tried to provide an answer with an interactive cocktail made up of modern physics, regenerative medicine, electromagnetic fields and the nervous system.
I have not arrived at a conclusion because Nature is mysterious and infinite, but I have worked to try to change the perception point of the most open doctors so that they can use and develop these ideas of mine to alleviate suffering in the world and transport therapy along new tracks .
The current therapeutic protocol for difficult to treat diseases such as Lyme syndrome, which is also related to every pathology type, has been transferred to the company that holds the blood stem cells’ patents. This protocol is used by doctors who have grasped its meaning and have begun to make excellent use of it. Unfortunately in human medicine the blood stem cells subsystem cannot be used, but these limitations have led me to devise alternative and futuristic systems such as entanglement and the stem cells’ frequencies recorded on a chip thereby allowing me to further enrich the therapeutic protocol in veterinary and providing new possibilities in accordance with the System’s rules on human medicine. It’s a bit like what happened to Yogi Bear when Mr. Ranger forbade him to steal the tourists’ snack baskets, he continued to find new and ingenious tricks to reach the goal: one trick after another to fight authority and the System when it’s in conflict with the sense of justice.
... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook

5 months ago

Elegante Alegria

Finalmente cominciano a darti ragione ... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook

6 months ago

Marco Polettini

Un piccolo pony affetto da una patologia neurodegenerativa curato con le staminali del sangue. ... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook